Adhere to consultation remarks #12

Open
opened 2025-10-08 10:40:57 +00:00 by ondrej.mekina · 4 comments
  • Source the first four pages from external file (this should be generated by STAG)
  • Change citations to be (always - no matter the locale) square brackets instead of paretheses
  • Add square brackets to bibliography numbers instead of dots
  • Add remark about underlines - they should not be used
- [ ] Source the first four pages from external file (this should be generated by STAG) - [ ] Change citations to be (always - no matter the locale) square brackets instead of paretheses - [ ] Add square brackets to bibliography numbers instead of dots - [ ] Add remark about underlines - they should not be used
ondrej.mekina added the
enhancement
breaking_api
labels 2025-10-08 10:40:57 +00:00
ondrej.mekina self-assigned this 2025-10-08 10:40:57 +00:00
matej.zucha was assigned by ondrej.mekina 2025-10-08 10:40:57 +00:00

Also, single-character words should not be at the end of the line.

Also, single-character words should not be at the end of the line.

Also, we have verified that 2-way real-time collaboration works without the need for Typst Pro.

Also, we have verified that 2-way real-time collaboration works without the need for Typst Pro.
Author
Owner

This seems poorly worded and must be further consulted. That's why it isn't in the original issue's tasks.

Also... "single-character words" seems like a big oversimplification. We could do that. However that is not the actual case.

See https://prirucka.ujc.cas.cz/?id=880

It's important to note that even UJC states that this is an advice rather than a rule. I could not find any relevant rector's decree on TUL's website.

The implementation is likely to be extremely difficult as we might need to include a comprehensive list of unbreakable terms.

The template already penalizes leaving a single character word at the end of a line, but it does not completely forbid it (if, for example, breaking before would lead to larger-than-allowed interword spacing).

I'm going to get another opinion on this and open another issue (if needed). For now, this is more of a "nice to have" than a critical feature.

This seems poorly worded and must be further consulted. That's why it isn't in the original issue's tasks. Also... "single-character words" seems like a big oversimplification. We could do _that_. However that is not the actual case. See https://prirucka.ujc.cas.cz/?id=880 It's important to note that even UJC states that this is an advice rather than a rule. I could not find any relevant rector's decree on TUL's website. The implementation is likely to be extremely difficult as we might need to include a comprehensive list of unbreakable terms. The template _already penalizes_ leaving a single character word at the end of a line, but it does not completely forbid it (if, for example, breaking before would lead to larger-than-allowed interword spacing). I'm going to get another opinion on this and open another issue (if needed). For now, this is more of a "nice to have" than a critical feature.
Author
Owner

We should fix this in example documents tho.

We should fix this in example documents tho.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.